Are you watching the Olympics? I'm addicted to it. In fact, I've been up every night well past my bedtime watching the swimmers, divers, gymnasts and volleyball players. It's so inspiring to see these athletes performing such amazing feats. The other day I was on the treadmill jogging and watching the 100 meter runners racing. I felt like we were running together - of course, I was going about 1/100th the pace they were going.
Watching all of these extremely fit individuals led me to think about the diets they follow to fuel the record breaking performances. I found some articles talking about the diets of amazing gold medal swimmer, Michael Phelps and his teammate, Ryan Lochte. You have to see what they are eating - it's mind boggling! While their calorie needs are really high because they're burning tons of calories, I would think their diets would be pretty pristine. Not so, for some of the athletes - filled with fast food! Gymnasts seem to be a little more conscious since maintaining a sleek physique is part of the deal - and they don't burn quite as many calories.
So, enjoy reading about what the athletes are eating but I wouldn't follow their lead - when it comes to diet, anyway. Let them inspire you to get off the couch and go for a run or a bike ride, instead. Enjoy the games!
Showing posts with label calories. Show all posts
Showing posts with label calories. Show all posts
Friday, August 15, 2008
Friday, August 1, 2008
Restaurants posting calorie counts
If you found out there were way more calories in your favorite soup and sandwich combo than you thought, would you start ordering differently? That's what is happening at my husband's office. He works in New York City and about a year ago the city passed legislation requiring labeling on menu boards for chain restaurants. (Since then a number of other cities have passed similar legislation.) When my husband and his co-workers recently saw that several of their favorite lunch eateries started posting the calorie contents for the items on the menu board and they were significantly higher than they thought, their orders changed. One of his colleague's favorite soups was astoundingly high in calories and quickly dropped off the list for ordering a "light" lunch. This is a good reason why labeling of foods at restaurants is so important - it's extremely hard to guess the number of calories in a dish prepared by someone else and we can be underestimating by hundreds of calories.
So, while it's always a question as to whether people will change their eating habits by just knowing how many calories are in the foods they enjoy, this has clearly been the case in my husband's office. I know that I would have a hard time ordering anything with a huge number of calories staring back at me on the board. Luckily, I live in the suburbs and can blissfully (and ignorantly) enjoy my favorite foods - for now. I'm kidding, of course. My hope is that menu labeling will spread throughout the country and perhaps make a real impact on the public's health and waistline. Because, obviously for my husband, this is making a real difference in the foods he's choosing and I know I have a definite interest in him living a long and healthy life. Do you think it would be helpful to see the calories right on the menu or board at your favorite eating establishments?
So, while it's always a question as to whether people will change their eating habits by just knowing how many calories are in the foods they enjoy, this has clearly been the case in my husband's office. I know that I would have a hard time ordering anything with a huge number of calories staring back at me on the board. Luckily, I live in the suburbs and can blissfully (and ignorantly) enjoy my favorite foods - for now. I'm kidding, of course. My hope is that menu labeling will spread throughout the country and perhaps make a real impact on the public's health and waistline. Because, obviously for my husband, this is making a real difference in the foods he's choosing and I know I have a definite interest in him living a long and healthy life. Do you think it would be helpful to see the calories right on the menu or board at your favorite eating establishments?
Labels:
calorie contents,
calories,
labeling,
legislation,
menus,
New York City,
restaurants
Friday, April 25, 2008
Can how much you eat influence your baby's gender?
A new study came out this week that's been getting buzz all over the internet, papers, magazines, and tv. The study from the UK found that women who ate breakfast and a higher quality diet with more vitamins and minerals were more likely to conceive boys than those who skipped the most-important-meal-of-the-day. They also ate more calories overall prior to conceiving - 2413 for boy mamas vs 2283 for girl mamas. (The boy moms were more likely to be exercising to use up the excess calories because there were no differences in weight or body size between the groups.) Of the 740 British women in the study, about 56% of the women in the highest third for calorie intake had boys versus about 45% of the women in the lowest third for calorie intake. Some researchers say that this makes sense as boys are more likely to be conceived in times of plenty because it takes more calories and nutrients to support the male embryo.
When I read these articles, I seriously thought it might be April 1st and it was all a big joke -- I mean it's the male sperm that determines the gender so why would the mom's diet make a difference? (After looking it up on the National Institutes of Health, it turns out the study is real and was just published.) But, maybe the mom's diet plays a role in which sperm gets to nab the coveted egg. Thinking about my own experience, I have 2 boys and know that I always eat breakfast and exercise regularly, so could it be true? Does this theory hold up for your experience?
Before you jump on the bandwagon and start eating more or less in the hopes of choosing the gender you want (if you're trying to conceive), there are definitely a few flaws I can see in the theory: 1) In developed countries, like the UK and US, there's always plenty -- in fact most of us eat too much -- so it would make sense that there should be more boys than girls, but that's not the case 2) the researchers site that women on diets are the reason for the trend that girl births outnumber boys in the last 40 years, yet calorie intake has increased for everyone (2283 calories for the moms of girl babies is more than anyone was eating 30 or 40 years ago -- doesn't seem like they were dieting. Calorie intake has been steadily increasing over time - women eat about 350 more calories per day on average than they did in 1970).
The bottomline is that more research is needed to confirm whether a mom's pre-conception diet can influence her baby's gender. The one thing we know for sure is adequate nutrition before and during pregnancy does increase the odds of having a well baby, regardless of the gender. So, eat breakfast and a balanced diet since a happy, healthy bundle of joy is the most important outcome of all.
When I read these articles, I seriously thought it might be April 1st and it was all a big joke -- I mean it's the male sperm that determines the gender so why would the mom's diet make a difference? (After looking it up on the National Institutes of Health, it turns out the study is real and was just published.) But, maybe the mom's diet plays a role in which sperm gets to nab the coveted egg. Thinking about my own experience, I have 2 boys and know that I always eat breakfast and exercise regularly, so could it be true? Does this theory hold up for your experience?
Before you jump on the bandwagon and start eating more or less in the hopes of choosing the gender you want (if you're trying to conceive), there are definitely a few flaws I can see in the theory: 1) In developed countries, like the UK and US, there's always plenty -- in fact most of us eat too much -- so it would make sense that there should be more boys than girls, but that's not the case 2) the researchers site that women on diets are the reason for the trend that girl births outnumber boys in the last 40 years, yet calorie intake has increased for everyone (2283 calories for the moms of girl babies is more than anyone was eating 30 or 40 years ago -- doesn't seem like they were dieting. Calorie intake has been steadily increasing over time - women eat about 350 more calories per day on average than they did in 1970).
The bottomline is that more research is needed to confirm whether a mom's pre-conception diet can influence her baby's gender. The one thing we know for sure is adequate nutrition before and during pregnancy does increase the odds of having a well baby, regardless of the gender. So, eat breakfast and a balanced diet since a happy, healthy bundle of joy is the most important outcome of all.
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Almonds are healthy and good for your waistline
Almonds are a superfood. They are packed with nutrients and eating them regularly can help to lower cholesterol. But what about all those calories? Well, a new study shows you don't need to worry. Women who ate 2 ounces of almonds each day (344 extra calories) didn't gain any weight over 10 weeks. Why? Since almonds are satisfying and filling, the women compensated for most of the calories by reducing their intake of other foods. Also, some of the fat in the almonds was blocked from being absorbed by the fiber content - so their bodies weren't really recognizing all the calories. Bottom line: eat a handful or two of almonds as a great afternoon snack or chop some on top of your morning oatmeal. They're really nutritious and keep you satisfied, making it easier to stick to the rest of your healthy diet.
Labels:
almonds,
calories,
weight gain,
weight maintenance
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)